<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>UH Biocomputation Group - Rene te Boekhorst</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/feeds/authors/rene-te-boekhorst.atom.xml" rel="self"/><id>http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/</id><updated>2018-06-26T12:17:09+01:00</updated><entry><title>Complexity of Biological Systems: Deterministic vs Stochastic Modelling</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2018/06/26/complexity-of-biological-systems-deterministic-vs-stochastic-modelling.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2018-06-26T12:17:09+01:00</published><updated>2018-06-26T12:17:09+01:00</updated><author><name>Rene te Boekhorst</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2018-06-26:/2018/06/26/complexity-of-biological-systems-deterministic-vs-stochastic-modelling.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Rene te Boekhorst's journal club session where he discusses the complexity of biological systems and presents the paper &amp;quot;&lt;a class="reference external" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519305803431?via%3Dihub"&gt;A model of ion channel kinetics using deterministic chaotic rather than stochastic processes (Liebovitch and Toth, 1991)&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rene te Boekhorst's journal club session where he discusses the complexity of biological systems and presents the paper &amp;quot;&lt;a class="reference external" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519305803431?via%3Dihub"&gt;A model of ion channel kinetics using deterministic chaotic rather than stochastic processes (Liebovitch and Toth, 1991)&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr class="docutils" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this talk, Rene will highlight some issues concerning the modelling of biological processes. The conventional approach to capture the complexity of biological systems is to focus on their unpredictability and to explain this in terms probability theory, i.e. as stochastic processes. Time series analysis and Markov Chains are popular tools for stochastic modelling and Rene will cover a few fundamental methodological aspects and assumptions of both formalisms. Rene will pay special attention to some terminological confusion concerning the probability distributions underlying Markov models.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If time permits, Rene will compare the results of a stochastic approach with a deterministic view of complexity, illustrated with a rather “heretic” application of chaos theory to model ion-channel kinetics by Liebovitch and Toth (1991).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 29/06/2018 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 16:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: LB252&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="neuroscience"/></entry><entry><title>Probability distributions for time durations</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2017/05/25/probability-distributions-for-time-durations.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2017-05-25T10:26:28+01:00</published><updated>2017-05-25T10:26:28+01:00</updated><author><name>Rene te Boekhorst</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2017-05-25:/2017/05/25/probability-distributions-for-time-durations.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Rene te Boekhorst's journal club session on probability distributions for time durations.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;I will talk about probability distributions for time durations (not time series). I will cover some basic notions of probability theory, random variables and markov models and how these yield / are related to distributions for durations of events.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 26/05/2017 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 16:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: LB252&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="Probability theory"/></entry><entry><title>Principal component analysis</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2016/10/20/principal-component-analysis.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2016-10-20T13:30:55+01:00</published><updated>2016-10-20T13:30:55+01:00</updated><author><name>Rene te Boekhorst</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2016-10-20:/2016/10/20/principal-component-analysis.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Rene te Boekhorst's journal club session on Principal component analysis (PCA).&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Principle Component Analysis (PCA) is used by many but understood by few.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this talk I hope to explain some of the math behind the tool, to raise awareness for its potential (and pitfalls) and to discuss the relationship between PCA and cluster analysis.
In addition I will present some examples of its use in neuro-science, from my own work in robotics and an application in economics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 21/10/2016 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 16:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: LB252&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="PCA"/></entry><entry><title>Artificial Life: Insights in Simplexity and Complicity</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2015/10/27/artificial-life-insights-in-simplexity-and-complicity.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-10-27T19:52:02+00:00</published><updated>2015-10-27T19:52:02+00:00</updated><author><name>Rene te Boekhorst</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2015-10-27:/2015/10/27/artificial-life-insights-in-simplexity-and-complicity.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Rene te Boekhorst's journal club session on simplexity and complicity in artificial life.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;In the nineties mathematician Ian Stewart and biologist Jack Cohen
teamed up to write &amp;quot;The Collapse of Chaos&amp;quot; (Penguin, 1994). This
insightful and at places very funny book explores the shortcomings of
classical reductionist science, especially the so called Grand Unifying
Theories (or &amp;quot;Theory of Everything&amp;quot;) of physics. One of the claims the
authors make is that GUTs do not take context into account and
therefore are at a loss to explain how on the one hand simple &amp;quot;rules&amp;quot;
can lead to highly complex and unpredictable outcomes (even in fully
deterministic systems) and on the other hand complexity can lead to
simple, global patterns. They illustrate this with examples from real
science (mainly physics and biology) but also with (virtual) dialogues
with extra-terrestrials and Ada Lovelace, the Victorian founder of
computation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many of the points Stewart and Cohen make in the book can be found back
in condensed form in the attached paper by Ian Stewart (Mathematical
Recreations, 1994), which I think is a highly readable and again very
funny account of some of the main issues surrounding the Theory of
Anything. He illustrates these with a famous &amp;quot;tool-for-thought&amp;quot;, a
simulation by Chris Langton called &amp;quot;Langton's Ant&amp;quot;.
These and other topics concerning complexity and simplicity are
important themes of the Artificial Life module taught by me and Neil
Davey for undergraduate students at the UH. I will use some of the
practicals (&lt;a class="reference external" href="https://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/"&gt;NetLogo&lt;/a&gt; simulations, including Langton's Ant) of the module
and final year projects inspired by them to instigate a discussion
about complex systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="reference external" href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/files/20151027-attachment.pdf"&gt;(Attachment)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 30/10/2015 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 16:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: LB252&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="Artificial Life"/></entry></feed>