<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>UH Biocomputation Group - Maria Psarrou</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/feeds/authors/maria-psarrou.atom.xml" rel="self"/><id>http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/</id><updated>2023-05-04T11:00:52+01:00</updated><entry><title>Functional Neurology of a Brain System: A 3D Olfactory Bulb Model to Process Natural Odorants</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2023/05/04/functional-neurology-of-a-brain-system-a-3d-olfactory-bulb-model-to-process-natural-odorants.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2023-05-04T11:00:52+01:00</published><updated>2023-05-04T11:00:52+01:00</updated><author><name>Maria Psarrou</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2023-05-04:/2023/05/04/functional-neurology-of-a-brain-system-a-3d-olfactory-bulb-model-to-process-natural-odorants.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Maria Psarrou's Journal Club session where he will talk about a paper &amp;quot;Functional Neurology of a Brain System: A 3D Olfactory Bulb Model to Process Natural Odorants&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This week on Journal Club session Maria Psarrou will talk about a paper &amp;quot;Functional Neurology of a Brain System: A 3D Olfactory Bulb Model to Process Natural Odorants&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr class="docutils" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The network of interactions between mitral and granule cells in the olfactory bulb is a
critical step in the processing of odor information underlying the neural basis of smell
perception. We are building the first computational model in 3 dimensions of this network
in order to analyze the rules for connectivity and function within it. , The initial
results indicate that this network can be modeled to simulate experimental results on the
activation of the olfactory bulb by natural odorants, providing a much more powerful
approach for 3D simulation of brain neurons and microcircuits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="line-block"&gt;
&lt;div class="line"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Papers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;M. Migliore, F. Cavarretta, M. Hines, G. Shepherd, &lt;a class="reference external" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3812742/"&gt;&amp;quot;Functional Neurology of a Brain System: A 3D Olfactory Bulb Model to Process Natural Odorants&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;, 2013 -10- 17, Functional Neurology, 28, 241--243&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt;  2023/05/05 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 14:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: online&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="olfaction"/><category term="olfactory bulb"/><category term="odorant processing"/></entry><entry><title>Manipulating Synthetic Optogenetic Odors Reveals the Coding Logic of Olfactory Perception</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2022/02/02/manipulating-synthetic-optogenetic-odors-reveals-the-coding-logic-of-olfactory-perception.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2022-02-02T17:57:48+00:00</published><updated>2022-02-02T17:57:48+00:00</updated><author><name>Maria Psarrou</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2022-02-02:/2022/02/02/manipulating-synthetic-optogenetic-odors-reveals-the-coding-logic-of-olfactory-perception.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Maria Psarrou's Journal Club session where he will talk about a paper &amp;quot;Manipulating Synthetic Optogenetic Odors Reveals the Coding Logic of Olfactory Perception&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This week on Journal Club session Maria Psarrou will talk about a paper &amp;quot;Manipulating Synthetic Optogenetic Odors Reveals the Coding Logic of Olfactory Perception&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr class="docutils" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How does neural activity generate perception? Finding the combinations of
spatial or temporal activityfeatures (such as neuron identity or latency) that
are consequential for perception remains challenging. We trained mice to
recognize synthetic odors constructed from parametrically defined patterns
ofoptogenetic activation, then measured perceptual changes during extensive and
controlled perturbationsacross spatiotemporal dimensions. We modeled
recognition as the matching of patterns to learnedtemplates. The templates that
best predicted recognition were sequences of spatially identified units,ordered
by latencies relative to each other (with minimal effects of sniff). Within
templates, individualunits contributed additively, with larger contributions
from earlier-activated units. Our syntheticapproach reveals the fundamental
logic of the olfactory code and provides a general framework fortesting links
between sensory activity and perception.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="line-block"&gt;
&lt;div class="line"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Papers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;E. Chong, M. Moroni, C. Wilson, S. Shoham, S. Panzeri, D. Rinberg, &lt;a class="reference external" href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2357"&gt;&amp;quot;Manipulating Synthetic Optogenetic Odors Reveals the Coding Logic of Olfactory Perception&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;,  2020, Science, 368, eaba2357&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 2022/02/04 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 14:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: online&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="Olfaction"/></entry><entry><title>Fast Odour Dynamics Are Encoded in the Olfactory System and Guide Behaviour</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2021/05/06/fast-odour-dynamics-are-encoded-in-the-olfactory-system-and-guide-behaviour.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2021-05-06T11:21:00+01:00</published><updated>2021-05-06T11:21:00+01:00</updated><author><name>Maria Psarrou</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2021-05-06:/2021/05/06/fast-odour-dynamics-are-encoded-in-the-olfactory-system-and-guide-behaviour.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Maria Psarrou's Journal Club session where she will talk about a paper &amp;quot;Fast Odour Dynamics Are Encoded in the Olfactory System and Guide Behaviour&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This week on Journal Club session Maria Psarrou will talk about a paper &amp;quot;Fast Odour Dynamics Are Encoded in the Olfactory System and Guide Behaviour&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr class="docutils" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Odours are transported in turbulent plumes, which result in rapid concentration
fluctuations that contain rich information about the olfactory scenery, such as
the composition and location of an odour source. However, it is unclear whether
the mammalian olfactory system can use the underlying temporal structure to
extract information about the environment. Here we show that ten-millisecond
odour pulse patterns produce distinct responses in olfactory receptor neurons.
In operant conditioning experiments, mice discriminated temporal correlations
of rapidly fluctuating odours at frequencies of up to 40 Hz. In imaging and
electrophysiological recordings, such correlation information could be readily
extracted from the activity of mitral and tufted cells the output neurons of
the olfactory bulb. Furthermore, temporal correlation of odour concentrations
reliably predicted whether odorants emerged from the same or different sources
in naturalistic environments with complex airflow. Experiments in which mice
were trained on such tasks and probed using synthetic correlated stimuli at
different frequencies suggest that mice can use the temporal structure of
odours to extract information about space. Thus, the mammalian olfactory system
has access to unexpectedly fast temporal features in odour stimuli. This endows
animals with the capacity to overcome key behavioural challenges such as odour
source separation, figure ground segregation and odour localization by
extracting information about space from temporal odour dynamics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="line-block"&gt;
&lt;div class="line"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Papers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;T. Ackels, A. Erskine, D. Dasgupta, A. Marin, T. Warner, S. Tootoonian, I. Fukunaga, J. Harris, A. Schaefer,
&lt;a class="reference external" href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03514-2"&gt;&amp;quot;Fast Odour Dynamics Are Encoded in the Olfactory System and Guide Behaviour&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;, 2021, Nature&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 2021/05/06 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 14:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: online&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="olfaction"/><category term="odor navigation"/><category term="odour source separaion"/></entry><entry><title>A comparison of deterministic and stochastic ion channel representations in a model of a cerebellar nucleus neuron</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2018/05/21/a-comparison-of-deterministic-and-stochastic-ion-channel-representations-in-a-model-of-a-cerebellar-nucleus-neuron.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2018-05-21T14:55:04+01:00</published><updated>2018-05-21T14:55:04+01:00</updated><author><name>Maria Psarrou</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2018-05-21:/2018/05/21/a-comparison-of-deterministic-and-stochastic-ion-channel-representations-in-a-model-of-a-cerebellar-nucleus-neuron.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Maria Psarrou's journal club session on 'A comparison of deterministic and stochastic ion channel representations in a model of a cerebellar nucleus neuron'.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ion channels can either be modelled at a macroscopic level, using a deterministic representation such as the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism, or at a more detailed single-channel level, where their stochastic nature is taken into account by using a Markov formalism. The Hodgkin-Huxley model describes the combined collective effect of the channel population on the membrane potential, but it does not provide a comprehensive kinetic diagram. As a result, various aspects of the behaviour and consequently the functional role of individual channels can be overlooked. On the other hand, a more accurate alternative channel formalism is the Markov model. In Markov models, a single channel is represented by a kinetic scheme comprising a finite set of discrete intermediate states with probabilistic transitions from one state to another. Channel noise, introduced by the stochastic gating of the ion channels, can affect the generation and timing of action potentials and therefore potentially also single neuron computations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the present study, the voltage-gated channels of a morphologically realistic conductance based cerebellar nucleus (CN) neuron model were expressed as Markov formalisms and their behaviour was compared with their deterministic Hodgkin-Huxley type counterparts. Our results show that the majority of the deterministic CN channel models could easily be replaced by stochastic versions, without affecting neuronal behaviour. However, this was not the case for the fast sodium channel, where the parameter changes that had to be introduced in order to match the activity of the stochastic and deterministic models depended on the level of activation of the neuron, even for very small single channel conductances in the stochastic model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 25/05/2018 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 16:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: LB252&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="Neuroscience"/><category term="Computational neuroscience"/><category term="Neuronal Morphology"/></entry><entry><title>An introduction to NEURON</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2017/05/11/an-introduction-to-neuron.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2017-05-11T10:05:33+01:00</published><updated>2017-05-11T10:05:33+01:00</updated><author><name>Maria Psarrou</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2017-05-11:/2017/05/11/an-introduction-to-neuron.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Maria Psarrou's journal club session where she introduces the NEURON simulator.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Biological computational modelling is a powerful tool to simulate a system and draw conclusions regarding its function. It also allows to make predictions for processes that still haven’t been investigated in the laboratory. NEURON [1, 2] is an simulation environment, where empirical data are combined with analytic mathematical expressions, in order to model single neurons or neural networks. Neuronal cells are created as a series of connected sections, able to form realistic morphologies, and where different membrane properties (ionic, synaptic and passive) can be inserted. The interface and programming syntax are designed to offer an intuitive environment and emphasise on the biological functions in detail, rather than the the programming or numerical methods.
The purpose of this workshop is to give an introduction to the NEURON software and how it could be used, by building a simple neuronal cell model and testing its behaviour under different conditions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr class="docutils" /&gt;
&lt;ol class="arabic simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Carnevale, N.T. and Hines, M.L. The NEURON Book. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;NEURON for empirically-based simulations of neurons and networks of neurons (2017). [online] Available at: &lt;a class="reference external" href="https://www.neuron.yale.edu/"&gt;https://www.neuron.yale.edu/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 12/05/2017 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 16:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: LB252&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="Computational modelling"/><category term="Computational neuroscience"/><category term="Neuronal Morphology"/><category term="Neuroscience"/><category term="NEURON"/></entry><entry><title>Multiplicative gain changes are induced by excitation or inhibition alone</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2016/12/15/multiplicative-gain-changes-are-induced-by-excitation-or-inhibition-alone.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2016-12-15T13:18:29+00:00</published><updated>2016-12-15T13:18:29+00:00</updated><author><name>Maria Psarrou</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2016-12-15:/2016/12/15/multiplicative-gain-changes-are-induced-by-excitation-or-inhibition-alone.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Maria Psarrou's journal club session where she presents the paper, &amp;quot;&lt;a class="reference external" href="http://www.jneurosci.org/content/23/31/10040.long"&gt;Multiplicative gain changes are induced by excitation or inhibition alone (Murphy, B. K., &amp;amp; Miller, K. D. (2003))&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Maria Psarrou's journal club session where she presents the paper, &amp;quot;&lt;a class="reference external" href="http://www.jneurosci.org/content/23/31/10040.long"&gt;Multiplicative gain changes are induced by excitation or inhibition alone (Murphy, B. K., &amp;amp; Miller, K. D. (2003))&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr class="docutils" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We model the effects of excitation and inhibition on the gain of cortical neurons. Previous theoretical work has concluded that excitation or inhibition alone will not cause a multiplicative gain change in the curve of firing rate versus input current. However, such gain changes in vivo are measured in the curve of firing rate versus stimulus parameter. We find that when this curve is considered, and when the nonlinear relationships between stimulus parameter and input current and between input current and firing rate in vivo are taken into account, then simple excitation or inhibition alone can induce a multiplicative gain change. In particular, the power-law relationship between voltage and firing rate that is induced by neuronal noise is critical to this result. This suggests an unexpectedly simple mechanism that may underlie the gain modulations commonly observed in cortex. More generally, it suggests that a smaller input will multiplicatively modulate the gain of a larger one when both converge on a common cortical target.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 16/12/2016 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 16:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: LB252&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="Computational modelling"/><category term="Computational neuroscience"/></entry><entry><title>Gain modulation from background synaptic input</title><link href="http://biocomputation.herts.ac.uk/2016/01/27/gain-modulation-from-background-synaptic-input.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2016-01-27T17:22:15+00:00</published><updated>2016-01-27T17:22:15+00:00</updated><author><name>Maria Psarrou</name></author><id>tag:biocomputation.herts.ac.uk,2016-01-27:/2016/01/27/gain-modulation-from-background-synaptic-input.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p class="first last"&gt;Maria Psarrou's journal club session where she discusses the paper, &lt;a class="reference external" href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627302008206"&gt;'Gain modulation from background synaptic input' (Chance et al. (2002))&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gain modulation is a prominent feature of neuronal activity recorded in
behaving animals, but the mechanism by which it occurs is unknown. By
introducing a barrage of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductances that
mimics conditions encountered in vivo into pyramidal neurons in slices of rat
somatosensory cortex, we show that the gain of a neuronal response to
excitatory drive can be modulated by varying the level of &amp;quot;background&amp;quot; synaptic
input. Simultaneously increasing both excitatory and inhibitory background
firing rates in a balanced manner results in a divisive gain modulation of the
neuronal response without appreciable signal-independent increases in firing
rate or spike-train variability. These results suggest that, within active
cortical circuits, the overall level of synaptic input to a neuron acts as a
gain control signal that modulates responsiveness to excitatory drive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The complete paper can be found here:
&lt;a class="reference external" href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627302008206"&gt;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627302008206&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; 29/01/2016 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 16:00 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Location&lt;/strong&gt;: LB252&lt;/p&gt;
</content><category term="Seminars"/><category term="Gain modulation"/></entry></feed>